Skip to main content

Math in One-to-One

Ever wonder what math looks like in an one-to-one environment? Is it just worksheets and math problems online, or is there an advantage to learning math in one-to-one classrooms?

Math in one-to-one

When I was in Tina Jada's class, I saw students actively engaged, engrossed in their learning the standards at a deeper level, with a context for why they were learning and when they'd use these standards in the real world.

Here's a glimpse into her 7th grade class:



Different teachers, different approaches, great learning

When I was in Valinda Wells' class, I saw more great learning. Her class started with a quick review for students to start on their own. After a short amount of time, Ms. Wells' showed a Screenr video modeling her solving the problems, her metacognition throughout, and how she deduced the correct answer. While she played the video, Wells was free to walk around to provide feedback, check for understanding, or guide learners if needed.

Next, the students quickly moved to new places in the room. Ms. Wells grouped them based on their learning styles, interests, and readiness. While she'd work with one group, the others were learning from online tutorials or other interactive online content.

One group worked on math projects. Ms. Wells offered a few different projects based on interest and readiness. Both projects required converting percentages to decimals, calculating sales tax, tips, discounts, and totals.

One project was a Menu Project:
The other students worked on mean, median, mode, and range based on the links Ms. Wells curated for them. The students collaborated for peer reflection and feedback. This was review content, but necessary for them to be ready for the new content in outliers and stem and leaf plots.

Ms. Wells designed the learning in her classroom based on task analysis and learning styles. She grouped them according to pre-test data and ongoing formative assessment.

Having the content online provided the students with multi-media tutorials and interactive learning. It also gave Ms. Wells the opportunity to work with all the students, tailoring instruction to their individual needs.

Final remarks

Both teachers had different styles, and both focused on the learning. They made math relevant and connected to the real world.
  • What did you notice about the learning in these two rooms?
  • Is there an advantage to learning math in one-to-one classrooms?
This post was inspired by Nick Sauers asking if I had any videos for what math looks like in one-to-one. Thanks, Nick, for inspiring me to take action!

Comments

  1. Tracy
    I find this post really interesting, although I was disappointed when I couldn't see the screenr video! By math-one-to-one I take it you mean making math relevant to individuals or small groups rather than teaching a whole class?

    Next year I hope to let students choose what they work on within boundaries of course. I am not sure how I am going to work it but I think it will suit at least some of my students - the more able ones. I think I may need then to guide less able more. Thanks for this post. Thought provoking and I am put it in my Diigo file to come back to.
    Kathryn

    ReplyDelete
  2. Tracy,
    Thanks for showing the world what goes on in a true 1 to 1 school. I loved seeing Tina and her students engaged and involved. Then the next link went to Valinda's web page, where I was totally engaged for a long while checking out all the links and Sqworl pages. I did find two Screenr videos at the bottom of the page where she checks the work. What an awesome idea! Students can re-watch, pause, let parents watch and learn--plus, bonus! She will have them for next time she needs them. Like Kathryn, I'm saving this post in my Diigo folder, and I've shared it with our math teacher.

    Thanks again, Tracy!

    Denise

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi Kathryn and Denise,

    Thanks so much for your comments! Our students at CCJH all have a netbook that they take home. So the one-to-one refers to the student to device ratio.

    Last year, we started 1:1 in 7th grade, and it really wasn't 1:1 in all of 7th grade until January of 2011. The students didn't start taking them home until October of 2011. This year, we are 1:1 in both 7th and 8th grade. So, this is relatively new.

    I was trying to show that 1:1 is more than just an electronic worksheet. It actually changed the learning in classrooms so you'd see small group learning, and you'd see students utilize the device to learn and to create. You see, I cringe when I hear about 1:1 and hear the teacher is up front lecturing and the students are taking notes on their device... because there hasn't been a change from a teacher-centered environment to a learning-centered environment.

    Major kudos to those teachers who were willing to try things differently to see what works best for their students with their teaching style. They both differentiate the learning with technology, and both have different effective approaches.

    Glad this post helped give a window into grouping, differentiating with tech, and 1:1.

    Kind regards,
    Tracy

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Directions for posting:

1) Choose "Comment As" first. If you don't have a Google/Blogger account, you can choose Name/URL and type in your name, then place the web site that best describes you in the URL (i.e. www.ajusd.org). Or, you can choose "Anonymous".

2) You may need to press "Post Comment" more than one time.

It is always wise to copy your comment before pressing "Post Comment" just in case something happens.

3) Type in the word verification.

4) If you did everything correctly, it will state, "Your comment has been saved and will be visible after blog owner approval." If you do not get that message, please try again.

Click here for a tutorial on how to comment.

Thank you!

Popular posts from this blog

Close Read Complex Text, and Annotate with Tech--Part 1

Students need to be taught how to read complex texts. One of the strategies for learning how is close reading. It slows the reader down to notice and ponder more. It also connects meaning and builds systems of thought.

Text complexity with close reading

Complex text requires a close reading. So what makes a text complex? There are three "ingredients" to text complexity:


It's important to understand text complexity to build students' literacy skills. As they become more skilled, they will read more complex text on their own.

Introduction to close reading

Here's an overview of close reading:




What does close reading look like in the classroom?

Here are some examples of close reading at different grade levels and content areas (or components of it such as annotation):
9th-10th grade -- Thinking Notes: A Strategy to Encourage Close Reading by the Teaching Channel 10th grade, Close Reading with nonfiction6th grade, Teaching Annotation4th grade, Close Reading3rd grade l…

Close Read Complex Text, and Annotate with Diigo--Part 3

Close reading is a strategy for reading complex text. In Part 1, the focus is how to do a close reading. The focus in Part 2 is how to annotate with iPads. The focal points of this post are the teacher steps in close reading; how to create text dependent questions for informational text in 6th-12th grades; annotating in Diigo; and creating writing activities to go with close reading.
Below are the teacher's steps for creating a close reading lesson. However, the student steps are in the poster shown on the right:

Teacher Step 1: Choose the text

Choose a short and difficult text to do a close reading on. It should be at the frustration reading level.

Some examples to choose from for informational text are short speeches (or excerpts from a speech); research; paragraphs or chapters from biographies, memoirs, or historical accounts to name a few.

Teacher Step 2: Planning

Plan and do what you expect your students to do.
Decide if they will annotate on a paper copy, with sticky notes, o…

Striving for Higher-Order Thinking and Depth of Knowledge

A little over a year ago, I read Higher-order thinking is the exception rather than the norm for most classrooms on Scott McLeod's blog, Dangerously Irrelevant, and have been mulling it over, wondering if our school district is any different.

Over the past year, our teachers periodically collect data with their teams on the types of questions/tasks they ask students. One teacher records teacher questions and the other records student responses on a shared Google Doc; then teams sort through their own data, plotting teacher questions by Bloom's Revised Taxonomy, and student responses to those questions/tasks with Webb's Depth of Knowledge (DOK). The 2012-2013 data showed we were not very different from other districts; therefore, our teamsset their own goals for higher-order thinking and depth of knowledge.

The data so far for the 2013-2014 school year shows questions asked of students are up and down the Bloom's ladder, equally distributed (with a little less in the c…