We use formative assessments to drive instructional decisions such as changing the approach or changing the target content.
|Created with Doodle Buddy, prompted by Stem Resources visual|
I spent February 10th with the awesome staff at Apache Junction High School facilitating staff development. While talking about differentiating assessment and instruction, we addressed the importance of adjusting our teaching style to their learning style.
For example, I'm an exceptionally visual person, and like to synthesize and put concepts together in pictures such as the one above. In school, I enjoyed geometry and calculus, but struggled in Algebra II. In fact, I took calculus as my fun elective freshman year of college. Why? It's visual.
While I was sharing this with our high school faculty, a foreign language teacher talked about how he excelled in algebra but not geometry. He explained that the geometry teacher would show him over and over the concepts, while he needed to hear it and talk through it. He wasn't understanding based on differences in learning styles. I, on the other hand, needed to see it, visualize it, and do it to understand it.
We must consider different learning styles when we check for understanding, instruct, and assess. We also need to take the time to know our students and their interests to really connect with them.
Differentiation and formative assessment
The above presentation was made in preparation for today's training. Below are a few artifacts created during the trainings:
I am encouraged by the discussions from today about differentiation in the 21st century classroom. The artifacts above are various formative assessments letting me know how much we are growing as a professional learning community, and it helps me plan our next steps.
- Why is “assessment” not a synonym for testing? What are the implications of that?
- How do you gather information/feedback to structure/guide instruction?
- How do you evaluate the data collected, and how does this change/drive instructional decisions?