Saturday, September 28, 2013

Grading to Support Learning

Grading should support the learner by being meaningful, accurate, consistent, and encouraging. Grades should encourage student success and the learning process by providing a valid measurement of student performance and achievement.

The frustration is, there is nothing consistent with grades. We all grade differently. It's subjective no matter how we look at it because how one teacher would grade something is different than the teacher next door, which is different than the teacher across the district, which is different than the teacher in another district. 

What would happen if teachers forgot how they were graded when they were in school, and instead used a grading system that fostered student learning? What would that look like? 

#1 Academic achievement is separate from learning dispositions and behaviors

Academic grades should measure the student's learning, and be a valid reflection of what the student has mastered according to the state (or district) standards. Learning dispositions and behaviors need to be treated differently. Examples of these are student participation, effort, attitude, preparedness, and attendance.

A child might not be prepared for a number of reasons. Maybe he's disorganized. Maybe he's bored. Maybe he's worried about something else. There are so many maybes. The bottom line is, this is a behavior that he might need help with, but it should not be reflected in his academic grades.

Participation is also a behavior. If she's working on a group project, the project should reflect her learning and her portion of the project. It is never okay to allow other students to influence each others grades. Individuals need to be graded on individual achievement. What this means is, the teacher needs to set the project up for individuals to do each part individually within a group. This can be achieved several ways:
  • each person has his/her own part within the project (such as having an expert role, or a specific task within the group's portion)
  • each person has their own artifacts for what is graded and completed
  • if it's a large project, such as a mural, then the portion he/she worked on should be graded
The teacher should still ask for the group to reflect on their collaboration, but this should not affect the individual's academic grade. 

#2 Quality assessments

Use quality assessments on a regular basis to measure learning. Quality assessments have a clear purpose and they properly assess the learning. There needs to be a variety of quality assessments: formative and summative. They need to be ongoing and done regularly.

Appropriate tools such as portfolios, rubrics, and checklists should be used for evidence of learning. Again, there will be evidence of learning and evidence of learning dispositions and work habits. Be clear about what is academic assessment compared to evidence of behavior.

Multiple choice tests are only one type of assessment (used for formative or summative). When creating these tests, a variety of types of questions should be used. Use the HESS model to evaluate the Depth of Knowledge in addition to Bloom's Taxonomy.

I received this message at "Meet Your Teacher" for my son's 7th grade teachers, and was delighted in our first encounter as parent-teacher to be a positive one.

#3 Scoring that accurately represents the student's mastery of content

Not everything goes in the gradebook.

I think about soccer and the coaching that takes place during practice (and even during the game) -- a great coach gives immediate feedback, which doesn't go in the stats. However, after a certain amount of practice, it's time for the game, and those are the results that gets recorded as stats. Likewise, the formatives (the coaching) should not go in the gradebook, but should be monitored to provide students with what they need to learn. When the summative is given, the teacher should already know that the students will be successful because the formatives indicate their learning, therefore, the summative is recorded in the gradebook.

Again, there should be various types of assessments given, including performance tasks, to better represent the student's mastery of content.

Some big points here include:
  • Allow students multiple assessment opportunities to show what they've learned and how they can use their new knowledge in various ways. Sometimes it takes kids more times than others to understand it. They should be given the opportunity to continue trying and continue learning, instead of closing the chapter and telling them they are done learning that.
  • There should be zero tolerance for allowing zero grades. Mathematically, a student doesn't recover from a zero grade. Furthermore, we want students to use it as an opportunity to learn, rather than settle for a grade that doesn't accurately reflect the mastery of the content (and the teacher shouldn't settle for a kid who hasn't learned the content -- no matter what).
  • Create rubrics that accurately assess the learning.
  • Involve the students in designing the assessment, recording their progress, and communicating their achievement.
  • Be aware that averaging grades does not accurately represent the student's mastery of a concept. For instance, when I taught 2nd grade, "Math Facts" was on the report card. At the beginning of a quarter, the students didn't have enough practice and scored much lower than they did at the end of the quarter. If I averaged the students grades, it would not accurately reflect their mastery. Therefore, I only recorded their top score, and kept updating that score throughout the quarter.
Rick Wormelli on grading and re-dos:



A shared vision of grading

In Tracy-Utopia, there'd be a shared vision of grading which would include the following:
  • The standards would determine what was graded.
  • We'd agree on what mastery of learning the standards looked like, and what exceeded, meets, approaches, and falls far below the standards looked like. Furthermore, it would be consistent from classroom to classroom.
  • Zero grades would not be tolerated
  • Students would be allowed to retry and do better.
  • What was graded would be meaningful to the students, because the assignments would be relevant, engaging, and worth their time.


  • What do you believe is the purpose for grading work? 
  • What would a grading system that fostered student learning look like?

Much of this post was written as notes during our AJUSD Leadership Team meeting with a powerful discussion led by Theresa Bartholomew two winters ago. I was inspired to complete it because of the expectation my son's teachers have for their students to succeed, which was clear from their brochure they sent home at "Meet the Teacher".